I typically use 0.0.0.0 rather than 127.0.0.1, then it's not even reachable.
Re:How Facebook Avoids Ad Blockers
by tempguy9999 on Tuesday December 03, 2019 @05:28AM
(#21691272)
Genuine question, it can't possibly be reachable on 127 anyway can it?
Put another way, what's the difference between 0 and 127 here? What makes it safer? TIA
Not OP but read about it on this hosts config [0].
From that page:
> We prefer to use 0.0.0.0, which is defined as a non-routable meta-address used to designate an invalid, unknown, or non applicable target.
> Using 0.0.0.0 is empirically faster, possibly because there's no wait for a timeout resolution. It also does not interfere with a web server that may be running on the local PC.
Re:How Facebook Avoids Ad Blockers
by huhtenberg on Tuesday December 03, 2019 @08:10AM
(#21691950)
For 127.0.0.1 it will try to connect and fail, either right away or on timeout depending on the on-box firewall setup.
For 0.0.0.0 it won't even try to connect (or fail instantly depending on how you look at it).
Re:How Facebook Avoids Ad Blockers
by breakingcups on Tuesday December 03, 2019 @08:39AM
(#21692117)
I usually have a web server running on posts 80 and 443 on my local machine. Using 127.0.0.1 will make requests to Facebook end up there, which is not necessarily what you want.
127.0.0.1 graph.facebook.com
127.0.0.1 staticxx.facebook.com
127.0.0.1 api.facebook.com
127.0.0.1 www.facebook.com
127.0.0.1 an.facebook.com