What is he doing?

Reposting what everyone knows? Intel announced this May they are planning to release their first 7nm product late 2021 and I believe they used the accelerate word. Based on what we know about their 10nm and 7nm processes, the chances of 7nm actually working is much higher than the 10nm.

Tweakers.net leaked and semiaccurate reposted https://www.semiaccurate.com/assets/uploads/2019/04/20026799... a leaked roadmap and there's the recent news of Rocket Lake -- a 14nm desktop chip slated for 2021. https://wccftech.com/intel-rocket-lake-desktop-14nm-cpu-8-co...

If you choose to believe Semiaccurate, https://semiaccurate.com/2019/04/25/leaked-roadmap-shows-int...

> Intel moved three of the four fabs slated for 10nm to other processes, some are going to 7nm while others backported to 14nm.

It's very clear Intel can't make 10nm work as they hoped it would and they will limp along with a limited number of halo chips for notebooks. They hope for server chips late 2020 https://hothardware.com/news/intel-10nm-ice-lake-sp-q3-2020-... but at this juncture I wouldn't be surprised if those would be first postponed then cancelled.

If this guy thinks I am posting insider info or stock manipulating, well, you need to go after wccftech and semiaccurate.

If the 10nm is a broken process and Intel didn't announce it, aren't they open to shareholder lawsuits for failure to disclose material facts?

It's the USA, baby, you can sue for whatever you want! I am not a lawyer to know whether this has any merits. AFAIK even Meltdown only got a few class actions, not a shareholder one despite the fact they released vulnerable chips months after they knew but before the public knew.

Of course they had to announce the delays regarding 10 nm products and people can draw conclusions from that.