The key piece missing is regulation, which he called out. It sounds like you disagree with him on going as far to break up a company like Google (which it sounds like you support).

But then you turned this into a personal attack and questioning his motivation, which you already “suspect”.

Regulation is missing, in my opinion, and breaking them up doesn’t address the problem and is a dicey proposition all together. But attacking people is breaking rules and only makes you lose credibility.