News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Urbit by OceanSunfish on Sunday December 01, 2019 @07:42AM (#21675207)
Perhaps the idea is that updates provided by OpenBSD or another OS for example could be compromised or simply directed to an unpopular path, but in this way a "senate" of code reviewers with known biases provides a more democratic way of reviewing updates before publish.
Re:Urbit by iudqnolq on Sunday December 01, 2019 @09:51AM (#21675693)
This is incorrect. Urbit has two paths for changes, a vote by the senate or a decision by the developers on the git repo. It only adds more ways of making updates, it doesn't fix the the devs can do anything "problem"

https://urbit.org/community/governance/