Re:The successor of SMS has already been hacked
by perl4ever on Sunday December 01, 2019 @12:55AM
(#21674088)
I am currently not using it, but it appears my local cable company offers a purported "940+ Mbps" for $110/month.
But I couldn't care less - what I want is something as cheap as possible, irrespective of speed.
They seem to have an option right now for 30 Mbps for $15, but I'm assuming there's some catch. I did think the low cost option was only available for people on public assistance or something.
I used to have a cable connection, and it seemed slightly faster than cellular, but it didn't really make a difference to me, and since I can't do without the cellular, it made more sense to get unlimited data for that, than paying more for limited data and cable service.
More bandwidth only encourages websites to add more advertising, anyway.
But I couldn't care less - what I want is something as cheap as possible, irrespective of speed.
They seem to have an option right now for 30 Mbps for $15, but I'm assuming there's some catch. I did think the low cost option was only available for people on public assistance or something.
I used to have a cable connection, and it seemed slightly faster than cellular, but it didn't really make a difference to me, and since I can't do without the cellular, it made more sense to get unlimited data for that, than paying more for limited data and cable service.
More bandwidth only encourages websites to add more advertising, anyway.