The Neues Museum claims copyright over 3D-printing files of the Nefertiti bust

Re:The Neues Museum claims copyright over 3D-printing files ... by perl4ever on Saturday November 30, 2019 @10:51PM (#21673741)

As I posted elsewhere, I think I have a philosophical issue with the idea that you can undo or reverse the creative process through creating an additional derivative work.

Say you take a lot of photographs of an object, and they are stipulated to be creative. Then you can use photogrammetry to derive a 3D model. So if the direct antecedent of your work was creative, how can your model be noncreative?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Neues Museum claims copyright over 3D-printing files ... by icebraining on Sunday December 01, 2019 @05:25AM (#21674827)

If I take one of those photos and I use a color picker on the first pixel, and I obtain the value #55A3FF and I write it down, is that value a creative work due to originating from those pictures?

Photogrammetry generally disregards essential components of what makes a photograph a creative work.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Neues Museum claims copyright over 3D-printing files ... by perl4ever on Sunday December 01, 2019 @10:33AM (#21675909)

My question is, if it's not a creative work, does it violate the copyright of the owner of the object photographed, if the photo was a legitimate creative work?

[ Parent | on HN ]