News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:In Amish village, a rural doctor sees the rarest diseases... by hyperpallium on Saturday November 30, 2019 @03:11PM (#21671908)
In a group without exogamy, selection for the group is selection for those genes responsible for the complex phenotype that is the group, in a similar but less strict way. This is true even with sufficiently minor exogamy.
Re:In Amish village, a rural doctor sees the rarest diseases... by toasterlovin on Saturday November 30, 2019 @06:05PM (#21672637)
Right, but then you don’t need a mechanism other than genetic selection. Because that’s what is typically meant by group selection: that there is an additional selective mechanism that exists aside and apart from genetic selection.
Re:In Amish village, a rural doctor sees the rarest diseases... by im3w1l on Saturday November 30, 2019 @07:52PM (#21673071)
Maybe we are talking past each other then. Because to me group selection is a type of genetic selection.
Re:In Amish village, a rural doctor sees the rarest diseases... by toasterlovin on Saturday November 30, 2019 @09:51PM (#21673497)
Then we are in agreement. Typically, group selection is not meant in that way, though. Just an FYI.