News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Excite CEO: Why Excite didn't buy Google (2014) [audio] by srean on Wednesday November 27, 2019 @12:10PM (#21649700)
> because search results were comparable to alternatives.

As an early user of Google I vehemently disagree. That better results was not due to PageRank alone is well understood.

Re:Excite CEO: Why Excite didn't buy Google (2014) [audio] by pmoriarty on Wednesday November 27, 2019 @01:35PM (#21650583)
I was an early user of Google too, and I don't remember the search results being any better than AltaVista (the dominant search engine at the time) or any of its other competitors.

Google was just fast and ad-free, unlike AltaVista, which was ad-infested and slow. That was the attraction for myself and the other people I knew who used it.

Re:Excite CEO: Why Excite didn't buy Google (2014) [audio] by srean on Thursday November 28, 2019 @09:26AM (#21657556)
Perhaps we used to search for different things. AltaVista allowed far more control over operators and filters, but invariably I would have to dig much deeper in ther results to find what I was looking for. On google it would be there on the first page.