News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Cut global emissions by 7.6% per year for next decade to ... by omginternets on Wednesday November 27, 2019 @11:12AM (#21649079)
That's a very strange way of saying "it brought them cheap, abundant, safe, eco-friendly electricity for nearly 60 years."

Yes, the infrastructure is aging. Yes, it needs to be replaced ... with more nuclear power.

It has a proven track-record. It works well with the existing grid architecture (which avoids massive costs). It's eco-friendly.

The thing that prevents nuclear plants from being built is not nuclear technology, but rather public opinion. Revisionist comments like yours, are doing humanity a disservice.

Re:Cut global emissions by 7.6% per year for next decade to ... by _ph_ on Sunday December 01, 2019 @03:40PM (#21677665)
Please claim that nuclear is cheap only after all bills have been paid. Dismantling a reactor can cost a billion or more, the radioactive waste needs to be stored for millenia.

And France will show, that you can't just replace nuclear reactors. They are certainly trying, but modern reactors are increadibly espensive. So they are currently building... one.