News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: Best Static Site Builder? by busterarm on Tuesday November 26, 2019 @11:43AM (#21639929)
I thought my post made it clear that I was both aware of that and built one of the largest Jekyll sites on the internet.

I'd link the damn thing but I don't want to dox myself.

Re:Ask HN: Best Static Site Builder? by forgot-my-pw on Wednesday November 27, 2019 @03:50PM (#21651984)
I was agreeing with you.
Re:Ask HN: Best Static Site Builder? by busterarm on Wednesday November 27, 2019 @11:29PM (#21654584)
Fair enough. Mea culpa.

I do want to stress though that in that case, Hugo's speed wasn't a positive enough tradeoff vs worse templating to switch.

We used both on a case by case basis there. A few dozen online properties. Hugo got used on the simplest stuff, often 4-5 page lead generation sites which is about 30% of what that company did. Speed of builds/deployment is basically the same there, but with Hugo the tooling/pipeline was much simpler.