News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Scala.js 1.0.0-RC1. Parent comment

Re:Scala.js 1.0.0-RC1 by vips7L on Tuesday November 26, 2019 @10:37AM (#21639170)
Why not scala native or substrateVM if you want lower memory requirements?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Scala.js 1.0.0-RC1 by virtualwhys on Tuesday November 26, 2019 @10:56AM (#21639358)
Scala Native [1] has been really quiet of late (last commit July 29), not sure what's going on. There was a lot of excitement when the project kicked off, hopefully it continues to evolve.

[1] https://github.com/scala-native/scala-native

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Scala.js 1.0.0-RC1 by ekrich on Tuesday November 26, 2019 @05:47PM (#21643532)
The creator and lead contributor has been finishing up his school but I am not sure of his plans for the future. There is a book coming out on the subject, https://pragprog.com/book/rwscala/modern-systems-programming... and I am hoping it will continue to grow and evolve.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Scala.js 1.0.0-RC1 by vips7L on Tuesday November 26, 2019 @11:39AM (#21639881)
Yeah I figured that was the case. There is a lot of steam behind native-image with graal/substrate though.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Scala.js 1.0.0-RC1 by kjsingh on Tuesday November 26, 2019 @04:56PM (#21643153)
Yes the user community seems to think that GraalVM can do whatever Scala Native can.
[ Parent | on HN ]