Re:Google Fires Four Workers, Including Staffer Tied to Protest
by shadowgovt on Tuesday November 26, 2019 @08:13AM
(#21637955)
It's really neither. It's the part where information on someone else's calendar was disseminated to an external third party.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google Fires Four Workers, Including Staffer Tied to Protest
by Fiadliel on Tuesday November 26, 2019 @08:55AM
(#21638243)
That is not what the note said. It said that screenshots made their way outside the company.
I would associate that with an email account that wasn't the work account, a printed page that was taken off-premises, a non-work cloud-hosted storage service, or to a computer that wasn't a work computer. It does not say that the place the information was sent to was any third party.
It could turn out that the information was sent to a third party, but that has not (yet) been claimed.
Re:Google Fires Four Workers, Including Staffer Tied to Protest
by shadowgovt on Tuesday November 26, 2019 @09:03AM
(#21638310)
Ah, I follow. "Outside the company" could mean "cold storage."
Re:Google Fires Four Workers, Including Staffer Tied to Protest
by Fiadliel on Tuesday November 26, 2019 @09:08AM
(#21638355)
Yup! I assume that at this point general counsel is involved in everything Google says publicly; it's then worth nitpicking at the exact details of what has or has not been admitted, because legal folk definitely have!