News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Uber loses licence to operate in London, will still opera... by VBprogrammer on Monday November 25, 2019 @11:12AM (#21629447)
I doubt there is a good solution to the problem in general but having ridden a motorcycle aimlessly around central London on my own little sight-seeing trips I can certainly get on board with the idea that London has been designed to be minimally navigable without knowing exactly where you are going (or having a GPS which does the same). This is at least partially due to one way streets, turning restrictions, traffic restrictions (bus / cycle only routes), no entries etc.
Re:Uber loses licence to operate in London, will still opera... by 72deluxe on Monday November 25, 2019 @11:36AM (#21629828)
It's the same for most cities and even towns, I'd imagine, eg. Sheffield (baffling one-way system to visitors), Birmingham (one way streets, central road by New Street actually leads to an underground car park if you're not a bus), Coventry (roads that go nowhere in the city centre, bus lanes that appear and then disappear after only a few hundred metres, cut across roundabouts etc). Try Redditch with its unnavigable ring road system - how do you actually get to the Vue cinema in the central shopping centre, even with a GPS??? Even towns with a grid layout (eg. Leamington) have no right or left turns across the grid so you have to follow a certain route around the town.

I think it's just symptomatic of hundreds of years of town growth.

Re:Uber loses licence to operate in London, will still opera... by UncleEntity on Monday November 25, 2019 @11:52AM (#21630027)
Probably because its been "designed" over a couple thousand years and they don't have cars for the majority of that.
Re:Uber loses licence to operate in London, will still opera... by VBprogrammer on Monday November 25, 2019 @12:24PM (#21630412)
I doubt many donkey and cart owners encountered the no right turn onto Piccadilly! All of the things I mentioned are very much 20th century additions.