News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Novelty and Heresy by philwelch on Monday November 25, 2019 @08:08AM (#21627770)
I believe Darwin shelved his findings for years specifically because he didn’t want the hassle of picking the fight he ended up picking, and only published when he found out that Wallace was about to do so himself.

Edit: As per Galileo not actually being persecuted because heliocentrism itself was heretical, Slate Star Codex actually addresses this argument somewhat: https://slatestarcodex.com/2017/10/23/kolmogorov-complicity-...

Re:Novelty and Heresy by jacobolus on Monday November 25, 2019 @04:48PM (#21633168)
Darwin did not “shelf” his findings, in the sense of stopping work. He just spent decades gathering additional mountains of evidence because he was worried that opponents would spring up and he wanted to make sure everything was watertight.

Then despite his overwhelming evidence, exactly what he feared still happened (and still happens today)

Re:Novelty and Heresy by philwelch on Monday November 25, 2019 @05:23PM (#21633454)
I didn't mean to imply he stopped working on it entirely, but he definitely put off publishing as long as he could because he was (reasonably) worried about what would happen afterwards.
Re:Novelty and Heresy by romwell on Monday November 25, 2019 @06:43PM (#21634170)
Welp, FWIW Newton did the same thing with Calculus.

The Leibniz independently invented many of these ideas, plus the notation we use to this day, and published first.

Didn't stop Newton for starting a war with Leibniz over whoddunit, though.