News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:If you care about user privacy, don’t use Facebook JavaSc... by r_singh on Monday November 25, 2019 @07:41AM (#21627590)
Depends on what the project is and also doesn't change the fact that this doesn't happen.

Most solo bootstrapped projects are not popular enough initially for someone to spend money / effort to hack them. When they do become somewhat popular though (very small minority of course), I suspect most founders bring experts on board, as they absolutely should.

> just using HTTPOnly and DB backend is not a solution at all

My comment was not meant to be exhaustive and does not list all vulnerabilities. Just in context of some of the suggestions in the article. Using a mature framework like Django can protect you from other vulnerabilities CSRF, XSS, SQL Injection to some extent.

Re:If you care about user privacy, don’t use Facebook JavaSc... by jonnypotty on Monday November 25, 2019 @08:31AM (#21627923)
>most founders bring experts on-board

You have way too much faith my friend. How does bringing an authentication and security expert into your organization make you more money? It doesn't. What people like this tell you change is all cost and only hypothetical benifit. I suspect this doesnt happen anywhere near as much as it should.

Re:If you care about user privacy, don’t use Facebook JavaSc... by scarface74 on Monday November 25, 2019 @10:11AM (#21628742)
You don’t bring “experts” on board. Most of them really aren’t. At most, you find a third party trusted managed service.

I work in mostly the B2B space where we integrate with their Identity Providers (active directory, Okta, etc) and strongly discourage them from using our internal authentication system so they have to take responsibility for their own security.

If I were working in the consumer space, I would personally use AWS’s Cognito since that’s what I’m familiar with and it integrates with everything - Google, Facebook, Twitter, Apple, Amazon etc.

I’m sure there are other services that serve similar functions.

Re:If you care about user privacy, don’t use Facebook JavaSc... by r_singh on Monday November 25, 2019 @10:47AM (#21629110)
Hey, I meant to reply on your other comment asking for third party trusted services.

Thanks for listing some, will look into them!

Re:If you care about user privacy, don’t use Facebook JavaSc... by ilikehurdles on Monday November 25, 2019 @11:19AM (#21629563)
Auth0 is another.
Re:If you care about user privacy, don’t use Facebook JavaSc... by some_random on Monday November 25, 2019 @09:31AM (#21628388)
>Most solo bootstrapped projects are not popular enough initially for someone to spend money / effort to hack them.

Strong contender for Most Horrifying Thing I've Read This Morning.

Re:If you care about user privacy, don’t use Facebook JavaSc... by mandelbrotwurst on Monday November 25, 2019 @10:41AM (#21629049)
It's good practice to consider the likelihood of attack in your threat model if you care about the expected payoff associated with your security efforts.
Re:If you care about user privacy, don’t use Facebook JavaSc... by Karunamon on Monday November 25, 2019 @10:50AM (#21629151)
When that threat model necessarily includes bored script kiddies and automated APTs?
Re:If you care about user privacy, don’t use Facebook JavaSc... by oaiey on Monday November 25, 2019 @01:02PM (#21630891)
Exactly. Like if user privacy does not matter but just cold cash. Thanks to statements like this there is GDPR.