Re:Cname cloaking, a disguise of third-party trackers
by rndgermandude on Sunday November 24, 2019 @07:58AM
(#21620140)
I glanced over the article you linked on your homepage, and you said you worked for google.
Google is and was actively fighting privacy laws[1] (e.g. seeking exemptions allowing them to even track people who consciously opt out of data collection), had a CEO that made no secret about his anti-privacy stance[2], was repeatedly fined[3], also also for violating the privacy of children[4], etc. etc.
How do you reconcile this with your assertion that google and yourself are good players?
Google is and was actively fighting privacy laws[1] (e.g. seeking exemptions allowing them to even track people who consciously opt out of data collection), had a CEO that made no secret about his anti-privacy stance[2], was repeatedly fined[3], also also for violating the privacy of children[4], etc. etc.
How do you reconcile this with your assertion that google and yourself are good players?
[1] https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2019-09-04/google-and...
[2] https://www.eff.org/de/deeplinks/2009/12/google-ceo-eric-sch...
[3] https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/21/technology/google-europe-...
[4] https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/04/technology/google-youtube...