Re:Study of “moral grandstanding” helps explain why social m...
by watwut on Thursday November 21, 2019 @02:38PM
(#21598531)
We do not send those who disagree about killing adults to prison. We send there those who we think actually killed people. That is massive difference practically.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Study of “moral grandstanding” helps explain why social m...
by bluGill on Thursday November 21, 2019 @03:02PM
(#21598860)
Technically you are correct, but I don't think it makes much difference: the vast majority of people agree there.
Re:Study of “moral grandstanding” helps explain why social m...
by sneak on Thursday November 21, 2019 @03:02PM
(#21598869)
Some we send to Afghanistan and Iraq, with pay and holidays and parades.
Re:Study of “moral grandstanding” helps explain why social m...
by bluGill on Thursday November 21, 2019 @03:05PM
(#21598890)
Opps, you are correct I forgot about war. There are probably a couple other exceptions to the "general rule" as well.
Re:Study of “moral grandstanding” helps explain why social m...
by mcguire on Thursday November 21, 2019 @03:21PM
(#21599088)
Back in college, I took a Contemporary Moral Problems class (from a professor who resembled Captain Kangaroo---it was surreal and probably an example of something). The one quote I remember from the reading was,
"I believe I have a moral responsibility not to wantonly slaughter my neighbors."
It's a short sentence, but the amount of waffling in it is amazing.