News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Serious in Singapore by pg on Sunday January 30, 2011 @08:34PM (#2159883)
The NYT just crossed a threshold with me: for the first time, as I clicked on the link, I thought as I did it "Ugh, I'll have to log in even to see what this article is about" and clicked on back before the NYT page even loaded.

Next stop: See (nytimes.com) after the link, and don't even click.

Re:Serious in Singapore by robg on Monday January 31, 2011 @10:07AM (#2161645)
You don't save simple pswds in your browser!? I haven't logged into nytimes.com in literally years.

If there was a better newspaper, NYT would get fewer of my clicks.

Re:Serious in Singapore by friendstock on Sunday January 30, 2011 @09:39PM (#2160051)
For me, this is an issue with Thomas Friedman, not with NYT in general.
Re:Serious in Singapore by jacques_chester on Sunday January 30, 2011 @09:18PM (#2159991)
Singapore has some advantages. It is small, so in terms of dollar-per-citizen, its infrastructure burden is lower. It is also located within kilometres of some of the world's busiest trade routes, both north-south and east-west; indeed its port is one of the world's most active.