Your statement doesn't make sense to me. If you're claiming that this WeWork situation is similar to someone fraudulently obtaining $20,000 by claiming they are someone else, I have to disagree because there has been no misrepresentations in the WeWork saga that I am aware of.

Oh no, there was no identity theft. Just a jobless man cashing in on his credit score.

Then I don't understand how a lender that lends money using the information they requested has been wronged. Even if borrowing money without intending to pay it back is wrong, it's still not relevant to this WeWork situation, so I don't see the point.