Re:Study of “moral grandstanding” helps explain why social m...
by bluGill on Thursday November 21, 2019 @02:26PM
(#21598364)
I always counter everybody should vote with make sure you are informed first. A republic is a terrible system of government, but we haven't found anything better.
Re:Study of “moral grandstanding” helps explain why social m...
by gnode on Thursday November 21, 2019 @02:47PM
(#21598670)
> A republic is a terrible system of government, but we haven't found anything better.
Variations of this quote are often banded about to apologise for and defend the imperfections of given democracies. It shuts down questions of electoral reform with the straw-man of autocracy. Not all democracies are equal.
Re:Study of “moral grandstanding” helps explain why social m...
by bluGill on Thursday November 21, 2019 @03:07PM
(#21598915)
I'm asserting a republic is better than a democracy.
There are minor variations of republics and how they elect people with resulting variations. However they are all better than alternatives (including democracy).
Re:Study of “moral grandstanding” helps explain why social m...
by gnode on Friday November 22, 2019 @11:29AM
(#21607077)
I'm not sure the governmental form of republic is terribly useful to discussions of fairness or freedom in societies. Norway, Sweden, Denmark and New Zealand appear at the top of the Democracy Index, and are democratic constitutional monarchies. North Korea, Syria, Democratic Republic of Congo, and the Central African Republic are republics and among the most tyrannous societies.
Re:Study of “moral grandstanding” helps explain why social m...
by filoleg on Friday November 22, 2019 @03:37PM
(#21609791)
> North Korea, Syria, Democratic Republic of Congo, and the Central African Republic are republics and among the most tyrannous societies.
I don't know about every single country on the list, but at least the one I am somewhat informed about (North Korea) is a republic only in name, as it is pretty much an authoritarian dictatorship state controlled by the military class.
We don't say everyone should make up their mind on whether somebody is guilty of a crime -- we say a few specially informed jurors should make that determination.
This makes me wonder whether demarchy / sortition / Athenian democracy (rule by the randomly selected; similar to juries) is superior to elective democracy.