News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Study of “moral grandstanding” helps explain why social m... by ouid on Thursday November 21, 2019 @01:40PM (#21597708)
I think people agreeing about politics is universally more toxic than people disagreeing. Discussions in which all the involved parties agree, but are obsessively defending themselves against an imagined foe tend to generate a hell of a lot more moral grandstanding than ones in which actual conflict exists.
Re:Study of “moral grandstanding” helps explain why social m... by dvtrn on Thursday November 21, 2019 @01:47PM (#21597801)
I've found myself on the receiving end of this 'obsessive defense' more than once in the past and had to completely halt a conversation in order to firmly but compassionately ask the person if they thought I was disagreeing with them and then show them how through statements we've both made we were in complete agreement.

The tenor of the conversation changed almost instantly. It's forced me to be hyper specific when approaching certain topics, but that hasn't come without it's own uncomfortable externalities of conversation.