News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Deep Learning and Its Implications for Computer Architect... by fizixer on Thursday November 21, 2019 @10:31AM (#21595062)
Short of TeX/LaTeX, I can put up with a Google docs paper.

I absolutely cannot stand a MS-Word paper. It's crippling.

Re:Deep Learning and Its Implications for Computer Architect... by zwieback on Thursday November 21, 2019 @11:38AM (#21595973)
Are you saying it's impossible to format a paper in Word to please you? Seems like there's a lot of options to get the look you want.
Re:Deep Learning and Its Implications for Computer Architect... by fizixer on Thursday November 21, 2019 @11:52AM (#21596142)
Well folks who prepare documents in Word, esp. formal documents, more often than not, pick the default rendering of Times New Roman (and I know the default in MS-Word is not TNR).

And a standard MS-Word TNR document looks like crap. I'm sorry.

But I have to admit I have an over-reaction to seeing an MS-Word document after spending more than a decade working with TeX/LaTeX exclusively. So part of the blame goes to me, and actually hurts my ability to keep up with the literature when I start avoid MS-Word papers.

Re:Deep Learning and Its Implications for Computer Architect... by zwieback on Thursday November 21, 2019 @12:10PM (#21596424)
Yeah, the default Word style definitely isn't anything like a typeset document. For fun I downloaded the "Latex.dot" template and some computer modern fonts, with those you can make a first approximation of the Latex look in Word but it's still not the same.

I've never been a fan of the Computer Modern font but the page layout and formating in Latex is certainly nice and just having a standard for scientific papers is a plus.