Google hires firm known for anti-union efforts

Re:Google hires firm known for anti-union efforts by tristram_shandy on Wednesday November 20, 2019 @04:33PM (#21588784)

Is it really evil if a few children die in the factory? Is it really evil if the work week is 96 hours? Is it really evil if we go hungry while the profits of labour are captured by people who are already millionaires and billionaires?

Unionization is simply democratization of industry.

Unionization of the workplace ensures that wages, safety, environmental and social concerns are addressed democratically by workers and management, organized collectively against the short term interests of rapacious capital.

So yes, preventing labour from organizing collectively is oppressive, totalitarian, and anti-democratic.

It's evil.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google hires firm known for anti-union efforts by lawnchair_larry on Wednesday November 20, 2019 @08:51PM (#21590718)

You realize that we are talking about Google, right? These examples are hilarious, but also a little insulting to employees who actually need unions. Which does not include any Google employees.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google hires firm known for anti-union efforts by blub on Thursday November 21, 2019 @02:29AM (#21592099)

Given that Google was illegally colluding with several other companies to keep employee salaries down, maybe said employees do need an organization to watch their backs.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google hires firm known for anti-union efforts by 8note on Thursday November 21, 2019 @02:38AM (#21592138)

it seems to me like Google needs unions -- not for pay, but for having a bigger say in what gets made and what shouldn't be created

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google hires firm known for anti-union efforts by redwall_hp on Thursday November 21, 2019 @11:54AM (#21596182)

And work hours. Exploiting salaried workers with insane expectations of what amounts to unpaid overtime is a really big problem.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google hires firm known for anti-union efforts by AndrewBissell on Thursday November 21, 2019 @12:17PM (#21596544)

Indeed, this whole particular story started when Google retaliated against employees who opposed its bid for a CBP contract.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google hires firm known for anti-union efforts by PavlovsCat on Wednesday November 20, 2019 @10:38PM (#21591225)

> You realize that we are talking about Google, right?

The context is "disagreeing with unions", which wasn't further qualified.

edit: and certainly not restricted to Google. Just re-read chrisseaton's comment -- downvoting me doesn't change what's written here, it just adds the data point of dishonesty and underhanded tactics.

> These examples are hilarious, but also a little insulting to employees who actually need unions.

How so?

[ Parent | on HN ]