Re:Ride-hailing apps have allowed more binging and increased...
by snark42 on Wednesday November 20, 2019 @06:30PM
(#21589774)
> If Uber were running a profitable business, the rides would be as expensive or more so than taxis.
Might be off topic, but in downtown Chicago before/after work cabs (including tip) are often cheaper than Uber/Lyft (with no additional tip,) although they offer other conveniences (payment, tracking, can be "hailed" to anywhere, etc.) At less busy times ride sharing can still be a bit cheaper than a cab.
Re:Ride-hailing apps have allowed more binging and increased...
by bhupy on Wednesday November 20, 2019 @01:22PM
(#21586722)
Was once a compelling theory, but in the last earnings (Q3 2019), Uber's ride hailing business was "adjusted EBITDA" profitable, with an increase in revenue growth. It's not hard to imagine them being GAAP profitable if they decide to sacrifice a little bit of revenue growth.
Re:Ride-hailing apps have allowed more binging and increased...
by disgruntledphd2 on Wednesday November 20, 2019 @03:07PM
(#21587920)
EBITDA is nonsense disguised to hide costs.
If you need to adjust it to appear profitable, then you are not profitable.
(Yes, I am aware that there are valid use-cases for EBITDA, but in general it is used as a way to avoid accounting for actual costs).
With Uber/Lyft, I never have to worry about being stuck outside in the cold, drunk, waiting 60 minutes for a $30 taxi.