News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:uBlock Origin: Address first-party tracker blocking by walrus01 on Wednesday November 20, 2019 @06:36AM (#21582964)
Image recognition algorithms client side. Accept and load the ad, render page, replace it with a white square over it.

If you're willing to get cpu/gpu intensive on the page rendering a lot can be done.

Re:uBlock Origin: Address first-party tracker blocking by vbezhenar on Wednesday November 20, 2019 @07:15AM (#21583194)
Ad blocking is supposed to improve performance. If you still need to download ad and then perform additional computations, I, personally, would opt-out from that ad-blocking, it's not hard to ignore ad myself.
Re:uBlock Origin: Address first-party tracker blocking by Freak_NL on Wednesday November 20, 2019 @07:21AM (#21583240)
> it's not hard to ignore ad myself.

It's a constant cognitive drain on your mental resources. That's even ignoring the fact that almost everyone is influenced by ads to varying degrees.

Re:uBlock Origin: Address first-party tracker blocking by Semaphor on Wednesday November 20, 2019 @09:55AM (#21584396)
I’d say it’s not a drain, but even as a long-time ad-blocker, I still am conditioned to ignore things screaming for attention. It’s been very often that I’m looking for something (eg. a link) but I don’t see it because it’s more visible than the rest of the page and my brain is conditioned to filter that out.
Re:uBlock Origin: Address first-party tracker blocking by dwild on Wednesday November 20, 2019 @04:41PM (#21588851)
> It's a constant cognitive drain on your mental resources.

We reached the point that this is the argument to avoid ads... People will go to such a length to justify blocking ads, it's crazy.

Re:uBlock Origin: Address first-party tracker blocking by qu4z-2 on Wednesday November 20, 2019 @08:15PM (#21590524)
That's always been my primary reason, honestly.

Yes, I also take the Intel Inside stickers off my laptop.

Re:uBlock Origin: Address first-party tracker blocking by soraminazuki on Wednesday November 20, 2019 @06:53PM (#21589948)
You can ignore ads, but you can't stop these companies from spying against users, which is a much bigger problem.
Re:uBlock Origin: Address first-party tracker blocking by bloak on Wednesday November 20, 2019 @07:10AM (#21583164)
Yes, I think that's the right approach. You just forgot to mention that in order to prevent tracking a new VM is spun up for fetching each page. (Of course this wouldn't be necessary if the browser were implemented by someone who was on the same side as the user.)
Re:uBlock Origin: Address first-party tracker blocking by psv1 on Wednesday November 20, 2019 @07:57AM (#21583467)
> You just forgot to mention that in order to prevent tracking a new VM is spun up for fetching each page.

Make sure the travel to a different country between clicks. Just in case.

Re:uBlock Origin: Address first-party tracker blocking by yjftsjthsd-h on Wednesday November 20, 2019 @08:10AM (#21583563)
I mean. I think you're joking, but if you use Tor then you're perfectly welcome to make a new circuit per website or whatever.
Re:uBlock Origin: Address first-party tracker blocking by HankB99 on Wednesday November 20, 2019 @12:30PM (#21586082)
The other problem with that is that I don't think it will block malware embedded in the ads.

Every once in a while I get a page that buries a CPU core. It's either bad Javascript (most likely) or something mining cryptocurrency on my PC.

Re:uBlock Origin: Address first-party tracker blocking by gbanfalvi on Wednesday November 20, 2019 @07:29AM (#21583295)
That still wouldn't cover trackers and content running in the background, audible ads, ads that pretend to be content in the article you're reading...