News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sweden Drops Julian Assange Rape Investigation by vintermann on Tuesday November 19, 2019 @11:32AM (#21574831)
This talking point had been soundly debunked. Sweden kept up the threat of charges and demand for extradition for nearly ten years, but dropped them like a hot potato when the US charges became public (when Sweden's charges would only get in their way).

Never mind that Assange was ridiculed for most of those ten years for claiming that US would seek his extradition.

His understanding of the world, including the assessment that Sweden is extremely servile to the US in security/foreign policy matters, has been vindicated again and again.

Re:Sweden Drops Julian Assange Rape Investigation by kls on Tuesday November 19, 2019 @11:55AM (#21575151)
While I don't disagree, the crowd is fickle and has at best a short attention span. He would have been better served to face the charges while it was all going on and he had the crowds attention. He is in a far worse position now, given that attentions and the world have moved on. The US can pretty much railroad him and no one will bat an eye. Whereas before they risked making a martyr.
Re:Sweden Drops Julian Assange Rape Investigation by monocasa on Tuesday November 19, 2019 @02:55PM (#21577505)
He wasn't going to face any charges in Sweden. They've let US intelligence just black bag people without any legal process before.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Repatriation_of_Ahmed_Agiza_an...

Re:Sweden Drops Julian Assange Rape Investigation by samdfonseca on Tuesday November 19, 2019 @12:43PM (#21575770)
All of the following can be true at the same time:

- Sweden dropped the charges after the US pressured them to

- The US has been seeking his extradition for years

- Sweden is extremely servile to the US in security/foreign policy

- He raped a girl in Sweden

Re:Sweden Drops Julian Assange Rape Investigation by acqq on Tuesday November 19, 2019 @03:22PM (#21577852)
> - He raped a girl in Sweden

He was just wanted for "inquiry" about the possible case. And some details of the case are here described, by the woman in whose apartment he slept, as organized by her:

"The statement records Miss A describing how Assange then released her arms and agreed to use a condom, but she told the police that at some stage Assange had "done something" with the condom that resulted in it becoming ripped, and ejaculated without withdrawing."

"When he was later interviewed by police in Stockholm, Assange agreed that he had had sex with Miss A but said he did not tear the condom, and that he was not aware that it had been torn. He told police that he had continued to sleep in Miss A's bed for the following week and she had never mentioned a torn condom."

Then, another miss "Miss W" some days later:

"However, during the night, they had both woken up and had sex at least once when "he agreed unwillingly to use a condom"." ... "Early the next morning, Miss W told police, she had gone to buy breakfast before getting back into bed and falling asleep beside Assange. She had awoken to find him having sex with her, she said, but when she asked whether he was wearing a condom he said no."

"In submissions to the Swedish courts, (Assange and his lawyers) have argued that Miss W took the initiative in contacting Assange, that on her own account she willingly engaged in sexual activity in a cinema and voluntarily took him to her flat where, she agrees, they had consensual sex. They say that she never indicated to Assange that she did not want to have sex with him. They also say that in a text message to a friend, she never suggested she had been raped and claimed only to have been "half asleep"."

Such nasty cases. The women "compared their impressions" (they were it seems friends) and then went to police, once he was away. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2010/dec/17/julian-assange...