Re:Hacker Publishes 2TB of Data from Cayman National Bank
by kortilla on Monday November 18, 2019 @09:51PM
(#21570301)
That’s certainly a popular view, but it’s not a given by any means. You will find plenty of people that think giving their children $100 should be possible without any government intervention or taxation. Unless you’re against that as well, we’re talking about arbitrary lines for when the government gets to wet its beak.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Hacker Publishes 2TB of Data from Cayman National Bank
by immawizard on Monday November 18, 2019 @10:37PM
(#21570458)
There’s an arbitrary line between handshake and battery, yet most people and the law system can see the difference.
Claiming there’s no qualitative difference between someone giving $100 dollar to their child as a birthday gift, and inheritance of billion dollars, seems like a weak argument.
Re:Hacker Publishes 2TB of Data from Cayman National Bank
by kortilla on Tuesday November 19, 2019 @03:39PM
(#21578022)
Then it should be obvious, no? Is $1 million ok? That’s a small single family home in Palo Alto in disrepair.
So how about $5 mil? Nice larger lot home in Palo Alto that some dying parents bought in 1940. Not even retirement money in the bay but could be middle class retirement in Alaska.
Where is your “obvious” line? Your handshake/battery analogy is shitty because it involves a victim and medical/first responder reports.
We’re talking about setting some line where we feel as a society it’s morally ok to start taking money that has already been taxed strictly based on “that seems excessive” without any logical criteria.