News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Facebook, Google Fund Nonprofits Shaping Privacy Debate by lifeisstillgood on Monday November 18, 2019 @12:17PM (#21566065)
Actually I have worked on projects for major UK rail stations along these lines - how many people on this platform then go to this platform, and should we build a bridge / open up a barrier.

I can see that as useful - it is targeted and pretty simple to do (although the anti-tracking mechanisms in wifi now makes it harder)

but ... I struggle with the value of such data collected on such a scale. Cell Tower radius is on the order of kilometres - the interesting stuff to do inside cities cannot be discovered on that scale - you need metres or better.

This feels like a mass public holiday migration watch. And you learn that ... people live in different cities to their parents?

Re:Facebook, Google Fund Nonprofits Shaping Privacy Debate by tialaramex on Monday November 18, 2019 @12:48PM (#21566363)
Cells have both a maximum range and a _maximum population_. The multiplexing that enables many devices to use the same spectrum to communicate with a tower is limited, so you can't just put up one tower in Manhattan and you're done, that'd fill up with users immediately, you need to add lots of towers in areas with many simultaneous users or the service is lousy. As a bonus the reduced transmission distance means handsets (automatically) reduce radio power, which means improved battery life.

As a result cells are naturally much smaller in populated areas where you're most likely to want detailed information. In a city centre the cells may be only a hundred meters across. True, up a mountain the cellular network may have no idea where on the mountain you are, but this isn't a Safety of Life application, it's a survey.