Kaspersky Antivirus 2009 source code leaked

Re:Kaspersky Antivirus 2009 source code leaked by ComputerGuru on Saturday January 29, 2011 @11:37AM (#2155696)

Crappy excuse, because it applies to binary software too.

I find a file called "Microsoft Office" on a torrent site, I don't know the license until I download it.

If you're going to argue "but you can Google it" then (a) the same applies to source code, and (b) put some abandoned but stil payware & under copyright title instead of "Microsoft Office" and the argument will hold (Google won't help).

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Kaspersky Antivirus 2009 source code leaked by jacquesm on Saturday January 29, 2011 @11:42AM (#2155706)

Sure. So I label it gcc.torrent and send you the link, you download it, find out that it's microsoft office after all, boom you go to jail right?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Kaspersky Antivirus 2009 source code leaked by ComputerGuru on Saturday January 29, 2011 @04:02PM (#2156360)

Hey, I'm not disagreeing with you. Only saying that your example is not actually applicable, because it's nothing to do with having seen the EULA. It's all about intent.

[ Parent | on HN ]