News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Prefer Rust to C/C++ for new code by _slyo on Sunday November 17, 2019 @01:28AM (#21556811)
> Your C/C++ programmers are likely not as well-trained as you think they are.

> The list of people who can write C/C++ correctly, under pressure, and then keep it correct under maintenance, is very short.

I see this assertion with increasing frequency lately. What if this list is not really as short as you think it is? People have been writing and maintaining massive C and C++ codebases all over the world for decades. These are wildly _successful_ languages.

Rust is a great language, and I'm happy to witness its rise in popularity.

If I'm being completely honest with myself, I love C++ for its razor's edge. Every piece of code can be _interesting_ (but normally shouldn't be, of course). The line between brilliance and insanity is fine, and exhilarating.

Is good software necessarily boring? Probably. Would the world be a better place if C++ were replaced with Rust tomorrow? Probably.

If I'm already competent in the exciting language, and there are plenty of places willing to pay me to write it, why should I switch to the boring language? Am I the only one who feels this way?

Maybe I should go learn Perl.

Re:Prefer Rust to C/C++ for new code by lizmat on Sunday November 17, 2019 @05:19AM (#21557297)
Perhaps what you're looking for is Raku: https://raku.org :-)
Re:Prefer Rust to C/C++ for new code by wtetzner on Friday November 22, 2019 @03:06PM (#21609503)
What makes you think Rust is a boring language?