News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Uber Hit with $650M Employment Tax Bill in New Jersey by akdor1154 on Thursday November 14, 2019 @09:37PM (#21541783)
> What you're basically saying is people wouldn't have driven their cars and stayed at Home if Uber wasn't a thing

He didn't say that at all, read his post again. He says that uber takes pedestrians and cyclists and PT users and turns them into car (Uber) users.

Re:Uber Hit with $650M Employment Tax Bill in New Jersey by mav3rick on Thursday November 14, 2019 @09:56PM (#21541857)
Go back to pre-Uber. No one called expensive taxis and used private cars, including the cyclists for non trivial distances. Uber came and solved the first step. Maybe some cyclists even take it for trivial distances. But that's blaming Uber for a good product and promoting a protectionsist scheme. Rather if you want more pedestrians and cycling, have more infrastructure and incentives to promote that rather than ban Uber.
Re:Uber Hit with $650M Employment Tax Bill in New Jersey by mav3rick on Friday November 15, 2019 @03:02AM (#21543127)
For all those downvoting ...what's the solution ? Go to phone call expensive taxis ? Uber is such a useful utility, most people won't let it go away. Too big to fail