Re:Show HN: RustyBox – a Busybox fork written in Rust
by arghwhat on Thursday November 14, 2019 @06:00PM
(#21540453)
This would be anecdotal, and caused massive stir in the community when it was realized.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Show HN: RustyBox – a Busybox fork written in Rust
by beatgammit on Thursday November 14, 2019 @06:20PM
(#21540616)
And a lot of the usages were promptly fixed when people made a stink about it.
Re:Show HN: RustyBox – a Busybox fork written in Rust
by jturpin on Thursday November 14, 2019 @06:50PM
(#21540866)
It was only fixed when a fuzzer showed a lot of vulnerabilities. Up until then the attitude was "stop demonizing unsafe, we know what we're doing."
Re:Show HN: RustyBox – a Busybox fork written in Rust
by cogman10 on Thursday November 14, 2019 @07:07PM
(#21540997)
I don't know about those particular authors. However, the vibe I get from the rust community as a whole is "unsafe is where dragons lay". Most, I'd say, treat it just like inline asm in C++. Sometimes a necessary evil, but not something you should be in the habit of using.