News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Oslo's Plan to Decarbonize Its Port by ericvanular on Wednesday November 13, 2019 @12:16PM (#21526611)
An interesting conversation around decarbonization in ports is going on at https://collective.energy/topic/29/green-hydrogen-from-sea-w...!
Re:Oslo's Plan to Decarbonize Its Port by mrpopo on Wednesday November 13, 2019 @10:26PM (#21532499)
> Is nuclear propulsion for ships a viable option?

Yes. There are half a dozen countries with mature viable nuclear naval propulsion technology, another half dozen in development. Hundreds of vessels already built.

The fuel cell technology is several decades away from being available to power ships, and we don't have decades to decarbonize the economy. The Arctic ocean is gonna be totally melted for the first time in human history in about a decade or so, and from there on the feedback loops are gonna make the race against global warming even more hopeless than it already is.

Go nuclear.

Re:Oslo's Plan to Decarbonize Its Port by ericvanular on Wednesday November 13, 2019 @11:48PM (#21532875)
Please post this on the site itself so others can hear your opinion
Re:Oslo's Plan to Decarbonize Its Port by nso on Wednesday November 13, 2019 @01:46PM (#21527803)
Off topic; does anyone know if collective.energy uses a ready-made forum software, or if it's custom made? I really liked it.
Re:Oslo's Plan to Decarbonize Its Port by ericvanular on Wednesday November 13, 2019 @01:58PM (#21527970)
Hey nso, thanks! I'm the maker of collective.energy - as you identified, it was originally based on NodeBB but has been highly customized to the needs of our community. Over time, we're moving more and more to our own tools & stack. What specifically are you enjoying about it?
Re:Oslo's Plan to Decarbonize Its Port by nso on Wednesday November 13, 2019 @02:27PM (#21528385)
I really liked how snappy it felt, and how minimalistic the thread view is. It's hard to put in words but it feels like a combination of many other software I've seen, but that it hits a sweet spot.

I'm currently building a BB software \in c# .net core for my own use and with plans to OS it, and your site gave me some ideas and made me question some of the choices I've made. I've been adament agains AJAXifying the navigation between pages, but seeing how well it works on NodeBB I am having second thoughts.

Re:Oslo's Plan to Decarbonize Its Port by thephyber on Wednesday November 13, 2019 @06:00PM (#21530699)
NodeBB is one of the better engineered forums. The code is a pleasure to read. It's very modular -- makes uses of Node emitters frequently to implement plugin modules via PubSub.

https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=psychobunny did a great job.

Re:Oslo's Plan to Decarbonize Its Port by ericvanular on Wednesday November 13, 2019 @03:43PM (#21529309)
Thanks for the feedback, best of luck with your project. Feel free to come join us also if you're into saving the earth!
Re:Oslo's Plan to Decarbonize Its Port by nso on Wednesday November 13, 2019 @01:48PM (#21527817)
Snooping into the resonse headers I found my answer, NodeBB. Will leave it here if anyone wondered the same. The price was pretty hefty, tho.
Re:Oslo's Plan to Decarbonize Its Port by dation on Wednesday November 13, 2019 @03:00PM (#21528785)
Discourse looks similar and is less expensive. Both are open source and thus free if you want to self-host.

https://www.discourse.org/pricing