Re:Brave launches 1.0
by RandomBacon on Wednesday November 13, 2019 @11:57AM
(#21526301)
10 (5?) years ago, that used to be called malware.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
It's not malware if it's done at the users request. And the user is free to display the web pages it downloads in any way they want.
Re:Brave launches 1.0
by RandomBacon on Wednesday November 13, 2019 @12:23PM
(#21526709)
Users willingly installed toolbars too.
And if it was truly willing, and the toolbar only did what it claimed it would do, then it wasn't malware.
It is nice analogy. Sophisticated malware disabled competitor's malware to be the one and only, acting like antivirus software.
About fifteen years ago, this was called Gator:
Re:Brave launches 1.0
by nostrademons on Wednesday November 13, 2019 @12:06PM
(#21526438)
You don't have a right to show ads to users. (The CFAA actually works in consumers' favor here: circumventing a user's adblocker is just as much of a crime as hacking into a server.) You do have a right to refuse service to users with adblockers, but to my knowledge Brave doesn't interfere with sites that do this - I still can't get past the paywalls on WSJ/NYTimes/Bloomberg.