News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:More Intel speculative execution vulnerabilities by coldtea on Wednesday November 13, 2019 @07:37AM (#21523357)
>Pray, why do you think I would expend the effort of deliberately increasing my 'exposure' if I did not notice the effects of these mitigation on my workloads ?

You'd be surprised what people would do. Could be just out of some spite ("fuck Intel"). Could not even include any measurable workloads ("I want my machine to go ultra fast").

>Do you understand my risk and load requirements better than I do ?

For you particularly probably not, but you'd be surprised how many times a third party can "understand the risk and load requirements" of someone else (even a business) better than they do.

E.g. the "No, you don't need a Hadoop cluster for doing "ML" on a 1GB file", phenomenon.

>Have you entertained the possibility that the decision to de-mitigate was the result of considered risk and resource management modeling ?

Only briefly, cause the tone of the comment made it sound more of a knee jerk reaction ("No I don't give a fuck about the 'risk' this introduces", "until everything is swapped to AMD") doesn't sound like the fruits of rational analysis...

There are no comments on this comment yet.