Nothing is preventing you from putting a sticker over your webcam, just like Zuck does.

Or I can close my eyes and imagine that nothing happened

Result will be the same

Stickers do not work - because people around you do not put it too magically

And what even sillier - that someone have phone with installed fb app in 2k19

Why are you concerned if someone else does/doesn't do something? You can only control your own actions. Not protecting yourself by covering your webcam because the majority of others do not is not sound logic. I have a bright pink piece of tape over mine, and it is always a conversation starter. I have seen later that many people do wind up covering their webcam. It's not a 100% conversion rate, but it is definitely > 0%.

Why someone want defend corporations? Especially those which breaking law

What motivations of such people?

Who here is defending "corporations" (by which I assume you mean corporate bad behavior)? Do you think Facebook and their ilk are the only actors who might want to hijack the cameras on your devices?

There is no good corporate behavior

>Who here is defending "corporations"

dylan604 try to change focus of attention.

This is type of manipulation. And in this context, this is defence

>Do you think Facebook and their ilk are the only actors who might want to hijack the cameras on your devices?

Nope. But for some reason fb can't do QA. At all

And this do most of the work for other "actors"

Why this happens?

wait, what? i am not defending evil corp at all. IMO, my comment about covering the camera on your device is purely self-defense because evil corp can't be trusted. how you can twist my self-defense suggestion as defending evil corp's decision to nefariously use the webcam is some serious bending of logic

> dylan604 try to change focus of attention.

> This is type of manipulation. And in this context, this is defence

>Stickers do not work

They do though.

They do if everyone put it

Do everyone put it?

No one else has a computer in my bedroom

So your neighbors with hires full spectrum light camera pointed at your windows does not count

Mhhh, okay

If I were Mark Zuckerberg, the sticker is the solution to my laptop camera, and buying up all of the adjacent houses is the solution to neighbors

http://money.com/money/4346766/mark-zuckerberg-houses/

But you are not him

And you still need to control your data

And you can't do that now effectively

And if people will defend corporations and hide its fu we will newer live in better world

This is an intentional misreading of the parent comment and does not belong on this forum. Zuck being a high value target for extortion/exploitation/attack is an objective fact. Saying so doesn't imply that anyone else is "low value" - attackers will attack whoever and whatever they can to achieve their goal, which is almost always money.

If it is misleading then first priority of fb is defending privacy and user data at all costs.

Everyone, not just one person

Nice

Other than not using them themselves (which, just to be clear, they absolutely should not be doing), how is Facebook supposed to protect everyone from remote camera takeovers?

Do QA

Do a security properly

Do a code for security

Do QA properly

Do not hide thing like Cambridge Analytica