News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Snopes Under Legal Attack from Salon.com by beerandt on Tuesday November 12, 2019 @10:25PM (#21520944)
If only Snopes didn't ask archive. org to scrub the entire site.

I wonder why a trusted, transparent site would do that...

Re:Snopes Under Legal Attack from Salon.com by dkonofalski on Wednesday November 13, 2019 @03:45PM (#21529346)
>If only Snopes didn't ask archive. org to scrub the entire site.

As with almost all of your other claims, a citation or source is needed.

Edit: On top of that, there are several other archive sites that do, in fact, have Snopes articles linked. So, you tell me... why would Snopes "go after" one archive site and not another?

Re:Snopes Under Legal Attack from Salon.com by beerandt on Wednesday November 13, 2019 @09:21PM (#21532219)
Most articles aren't archived or have also been scrubbed. Or only have a single recent version archived. For instance archive.is has entries for maybe 2000 out of the 10s of thousands Snopes articles. Of those, less than 5% have multiple archived versions.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/*

This isn't exactly the type of site I'd usually reference, but this woman recorded quite a few page delta's about gmo food and Monsanto, and the Snopes pages getting edited after large ad buys by the company.

https://foodbabe.com/do-you-trust-snopes-you-wont-after-read...

Re:Snopes Under Legal Attack from Salon.com by wl on Wednesday November 13, 2019 @05:08PM (#21530169)
> Sorry.

> This URL has been excluded from the Wayback Machine.

https://web.archive.org/web/*/snopes.com

The Wayback Machine only excludes sites upon request.