Re:One Google Staffer Fired, Two Others Put on Leave Amid Te...
by ajross on Tuesday November 12, 2019 @09:02PM
(#21520518)
An extension is the kind of random IT junk companies push all the time. Pushing surveillance into the server side of a core product is rather more heavy an operation.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:One Google Staffer Fired, Two Others Put on Leave Amid Te...
by mindslight on Wednesday November 13, 2019 @12:17AM
(#21521340)
But Google's core business is surveillance. Implementing it server-side could make it available as a GSuite feature. Bonus points for passing it through an opaque ML step for plausible deniability. "The 'culture fit' 'algorithm' determined that you hurt team cohesion".
Re:One Google Staffer Fired, Two Others Put on Leave Amid Te...
by Normal_gaussian on Wednesday November 13, 2019 @01:03AM
(#21521507)
Making it a prod ready feature would take weeks, a pile of money, and dozens of staff who may object and are in a position to do something about it.
Making a single use extension takes an hour or three by a contractor who won't object. Its trivial enough that the whole thing could be built using a bottom of the barrel freelancer site with a high success rate.
Re:One Google Staffer Fired, Two Others Put on Leave Amid Te...
by mindslight on Thursday November 14, 2019 @06:40PM
(#21540784)
Yeah, and Eric Schmidt could have simply taken a digital camera into a public restroom, snapped some pictures over the stall walls, and been satiated. Yet here we are.