News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Privacy: Is That iPhone? by mojuba on Tuesday November 12, 2019 @07:40PM (#21519940)
Unfortunately the majority of more or less useful or popular apps are also linked against various analytics/attribution platforms, often many of them at once. Mixpanel, Amplitude, AppsFlyer, Branch to name a few, plus Facebook and/or Google. In fact having any of the Google's or Facebook's SDKs means tracking, e.g. Maps, Login etc.

Somehow these platforms have no problem with identifying users across their client apps even without the IDFA. Maybe it's not 100% precise, but as far as I can tell these companies keep so much information about us away from our eyes, that even the big guys (G, FB) would be jealous.

Analytics is one big dark corner of the mobile business whose significance is not fully appreciated (yet).

Re:Privacy: Is That iPhone? by snarf21 on Wednesday November 13, 2019 @09:41AM (#21524592)
Right, how often does our external IP change on our home WiFi network or work WiFi network? There are so many other things that can be used to fingerprint. This is part of the reason encrypted DNS and other efforts have some merit. The cell providers have data and know exactly where you are via triangulation.

Has anyone been using Cloudflare's Warp VPN? I wonder if this is the best approach. Paying a private company to act as a one hop TOR to minimize fingerprinting. If the cell networks just see all CF traffic, they may know where I am but not who I'm connecting too. I get that this means I must trust CF but I trust them more than ATT/Verizon anyway. I just want some open source from CF on the mobile side that shows that the private keys are kept in the device's SecureEnclave and not anywhere on disk.

Re:Privacy: Is That iPhone? by peteretep on Tuesday November 12, 2019 @09:58PM (#21520816)
> Maybe it's not 100% precise, but as far as I can tell these companies keep so much information about us away from our eyes, that even the big guys (G, FB) would be jealous.

Ooooh, think of the GDPR fines!

Re:Privacy: Is That iPhone? by api on Tuesday November 12, 2019 @08:07PM (#21520138)
Mobile is all about surveillance as near as I can see. The whole purpose of it is to track users.
Re:Privacy: Is That iPhone? by BurningFrog on Tuesday November 12, 2019 @10:03PM (#21520843)
There were mobile phones decades before any of this existed.
Re:Privacy: Is That iPhone? by krageon on Wednesday November 13, 2019 @04:59AM (#21522529)
And to the extent that this was practical, they have always been used for surveillance.
Re:Privacy: Is That iPhone? by BurningFrog on Wednesday November 13, 2019 @09:55AM (#21524776)
Maybe I'm splitting hairs, but that's definitely not their primary purpose, which is what I think OP was saying.

Sure, once they exist, there are secondary effects who are important in themselves.

Re:Privacy: Is That iPhone? by api on Wednesday November 13, 2019 @09:13AM (#21524243)
Yeah I guess people carrying around transmitters is too easy to exploit for surveillance and it's just irresistible.
Re:Privacy: Is That iPhone? by kevin_thibedeau on Tuesday November 12, 2019 @09:52PM (#21520793)
How else should a telescreen function?
Re:Privacy: Is That iPhone? by mrgreenfur on Wednesday November 13, 2019 @11:29AM (#21525959)
I think the push to apps was to get persistent tracking while offering the user the olive branch of new apis/better battery life/etc. The browser is a prophylactic against apps and their uncontrolled behaviors.