Re:Court: Suspicionless Searches of Travelers’ Phones and La...
by BrainInAJar on Tuesday November 12, 2019 @05:58PM
(#21519164)
at the border you are not yet on US soil. They can deny you for any reason at all
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Court: Suspicionless Searches of Travelers’ Phones and La...
by miles on Tuesday November 12, 2019 @06:47PM
(#21519517)
As Taniwha pointed out above[0]:
> If you make that argument then the customs officers are also NOT on US soil and have no authority to search phones (or do anything) at all
Re:Court: Suspicionless Searches of Travelers’ Phones and La...
by gamblor956 on Tuesday November 12, 2019 @07:20PM
(#21519767)
Even if that's true, that simply means the search moves a few feet to US soil, where they stand on one side of the border and you stand on the other. And they don't have to let you in if you're not a US citizen or lawful resident.
Re:Court: Suspicionless Searches of Travelers’ Phones and La...
by x86_64Ubuntu on Tuesday November 12, 2019 @08:34PM
(#21520332)
Doesn't being subject to search apply regardless of citizenship status?
Re:Court: Suspicionless Searches of Travelers’ Phones and La...
by gamblor956 on Tuesday November 12, 2019 @09:43PM
(#21520754)
No, if you're a citizen or lawful resident they have to let you in...eventually. Courts have ruled that they can hold you at the border for a few hours.
Re:Court: Suspicionless Searches of Travelers’ Phones and La...
by BrainInAJar on Tuesday November 12, 2019 @06:03PM
(#21519209)
and constitutionally speaking, permanent exile isn't considered a punishment for noncitizens, so SCOTUS can rule whatever they want is unconstitutional, it still means they're gonna do it