Re:Google's harvest of medical data includes names and full ...
by Aaronstotle on Tuesday November 12, 2019 @11:58AM
(#21515666)
Any google employees/friends of google employees here with insight as how staff is receiving this news? My guess is like all other egregious abuses of power, the employees will stage a "protest" to feel good about themselves then keep working there.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google's harvest of medical data includes names and full ...
by mc32 on Tuesday November 12, 2019 @12:08PM
(#21515757)
I don’t see them staging a protest. The issue is too mainstream to earn them any Internet points. However, this is the kind of issue that matters to many people and could affect adversely. Still I think it’s up to the Congress and people to push back on abuses like this.
Re:Google's harvest of medical data includes names and full ...
by urgeblumbling on Tuesday November 12, 2019 @12:03PM
(#21515708)
As opposed to yelling into the void on an anonymous online forum?
Re:Google's harvest of medical data includes names and full ...
by shadowgovt on Tuesday November 12, 2019 @04:35PM
(#21518414)
I don't think they see this as an egregious abuse of power. Googlers trust Google to do a pretty decent job of securing private information almost all of the time; this isn't an area of moral concern for them.
(i.e. the question in their minds is "Is the data safer in the source repositories?" And it's probably not).
Re:Google's harvest of medical data includes names and full ...
by JohnFen on Tuesday November 12, 2019 @06:08PM
(#21519249)
The problem is that Googlers (like far too many tech companies) view data as being secure if outsiders can't get access to it. They don't count access by themselves as a security issue, even though it objectively is.
Re:Google's harvest of medical data includes names and full ...
by smueller1234 on Tuesday November 12, 2019 @08:08PM
(#21520154)
Googler here. I don't speak for Google and obviously shouldn't and won't divulge internals, but this just makes me cringe so hard: unauthorized or illegitimate access by staff is OBVIOUSLY treated as a security issue. I'm kind of shocked that folks would think otherwise.
Re:Google's harvest of medical data includes names and full ...
by JohnFen on Wednesday November 13, 2019 @12:02PM
(#21526382)
Just to clarify, I was not referring to unauthorized or illegitimate access. I was referring to company-sanctioned access.
Re:Google's harvest of medical data includes names and full ...
by mav3rick on Tuesday November 12, 2019 @01:45PM
(#21516807)
Unlike other companies Google employees atleast protest. In many cases they win. No company is a saint. It's a bit rich asking everyone to leave their jobs. 99% of HN will work for the most money. Google still tries its best unlike Facebook or Oracle. None of the good things it does ever get attention.
Re:Google's harvest of medical data includes names and full ...
by Zenst on Tuesday November 12, 2019 @12:19PM
(#21515861)
I wonder what type of biometric and other monitoring of employees by employers that could happen under employment contracts or in the name of security or `Health and Safety`.
After all, many companies trial new ideas and technology in house.
So would be insightful into what companies like Google do inhouse.
Re:Google's harvest of medical data includes names and full ...
by big_chungus on Tuesday November 12, 2019 @12:39PM
(#21516102)
Google's employees appear from their past behavior to protest when the issue at hand is one about which the far left cares. [0][1][2][3][4] This issue is rather bi-partisan, so I don't expect any significant protest.
[0]: https://www.zdnet.com/article/google-employees-protest-dont-...
[1]: https://www.theverge.com/2019/7/16/20695964/google-protest-l...
[2]: https://www.cnn.com/2019/05/01/tech/google-employees-protest...
[3]: https://www.vox.com/recode/2019/6/19/18691870/google-employe...
[4]: https://www.theverge.com/2019/5/1/18525473/google-employee-s...