I spent about five minutes reading the discussion at your r/JordanPeterson link. While I see the link has spurred some substantive discussion stemming from the "ha ha only serious" Babylon Bee article, I'm not seeing anyone confused that this is real news.

Doesn't seem to be unlike HN where we basically just kneejerk respond to titles and titles are more like open-ended writing prompts for us that mainly have the purpose of introducing a topic like "javascript sucks" or "weight loss is just CICO" or whichever hobby horses we have chomping at the bit.

Babylon Bee is also well known to be satire. I would also say it doesn't have an "extreme" bias. It's about as far right of center as the Onion is far left, which is to say some, but not particularly extreme.

> Clearly many right and alt right subreddits are taking stories from there seriously, including r/conservative.

The entire subreddit r/atetheonion is dedicated to people believing Onion articles. Bablylon Bee is not unique in this regard.

I think this is the bias people are generally referring to here. The Babylon Bee isn't extreme in its partisan leaning, and is a popular satirical site. But because that lean is right, rather than left, it gets painted as more extreme, or people feel that there is some kind of more pressing need to label it as satire.

It indicates that the "fact checkers" may be in a bubble of their own and are failing to account for their biases appropriately.