News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:YouTube says it has ‘no obligation’ to host anyone’s video by vkou on Monday November 11, 2019 @12:46PM (#21506896)
Yes, only another business model would solve this issue.

> How do we get there? Assuming users still don't want to pay for cat videos.

Peer-to-peer torrent-like distribution. Of course, then you'll have the problem where the system will be full of pirated content, illegal content, etc, and you'll get to enjoy attention from police and regulators.

Re:YouTube says it has ‘no obligation’ to host anyone’s video by zanny on Monday November 11, 2019 @01:30PM (#21507358)
Peertube already exists and has seen growing usage: https://joinpeertube.org

Of course, it doesn't have an ad or patronage model built in.

Re:YouTube says it has ‘no obligation’ to host anyone’s video by vkou on Monday November 11, 2019 @01:57PM (#21507685)
So, what you're saying is that it's useless to the people complaining about their videos being demonetized, or not getting a firehose of algorithmic marketing.
Re:YouTube says it has ‘no obligation’ to host anyone’s video by AnIdiotOnTheNet on Monday November 11, 2019 @12:52PM (#21506944)
Not to mention that anything unpopular will be poorly distributed and harder to access than popular stuff... which kinda defeats the point really. YouTube loves popular stuff because it makes money.