Re:Key details of Galileo satellite summer failure emerge
by biscotte_ on Monday November 11, 2019 @06:24AM
(#21503878)
Airbus is NOT a european project, it is a private company, with many entities being in China or the US, while many european countries don’t contribute to it at all.
Galileo on the other hand is a Commission project, with a budget agreed upon by members, with different views on what it should be (Germany wants it business oriented, France wants it military-oriented).
Re:Key details of Galileo satellite summer failure emerge
by ClumsyPilot on Monday November 11, 2019 @08:26AM
(#21504639)
"It had been originally formed by a government initiative between France, West Germany and the UK that originated in 1967."
While not an EU project, it's roots come from European integration. It's not a company that sprung up on random private initiative a la Amazon
Re:Key details of Galileo satellite summer failure emerge
by bildung on Monday November 11, 2019 @09:31AM
(#21505083)
Technically it is a private company, yes, but it originated as a project created and owned by several European countries, and more than a quarter of Airbus' shares are still owned by these countries.
So apart from n=1 always being on the low side to draw vast conclusions, any comparison with similar projects will show that this kind of thing simply happens with complex projects. How's the F-35 these days? Or the 737-MAX?
The Airbus/Boeing comparison may actually be the most informative here, Airbus being the quintessential pan-European technology project. And if you compare them over the decades of their existence, I believe the only conclusion one can be confident in is that then national/international difference in their respective setups just doesn't matter that much.