Re:For Quebec, a French Woman May Not Be French Enough
by Gunax on Monday November 11, 2019 @01:14AM
(#21502597)
The Manitoba legislature building offers guided tours in English and French at alternating times. Of course the French tour is probably empty >90% of the time, but it still has to be offered in equal frequency. It wouldn't be fair to offer the English tour every 30 minutes, but only do the French tour twice per day.
So it's not just an issue of access, but equal access. That's why I called it 'bending over backwards'. It feels like a lot of politically-correct posturing that ignores the reality that there are very few French speakers in Winnipeg.
Despite all of this, the French services probably still suck. It's likely that they are equal on paper, but not in reality.
Re:For Quebec, a French Woman May Not Be French Enough
by deanCommie on Monday November 11, 2019 @07:43PM
(#21510453)
That's Manitoba's CHOICE, it's not federally required.
Most provinces do not make that choice, the further west you go.
Citation needed. Federal government offers services in French almost everywhere, as it offers services in English even in areas where almost no one speaks it.
But provincial services? There's just nothing. Ontario struggles to keep higher education and health services in French, and this is the province with the highest number of French speakers outside Quebec. There is a party in New Brunswick explicitly against providing services in French and they got 13% of the vote in the last election (reminder, New Brunswick is the only province to be officially bilingual).
So I am highly skeptical of your stance about the rest of Canada "bending over backward" to offer services in French...