Re:Andrej Karpathy talks about how Tesla's NNs are structure...
by perl4ever on Sunday November 10, 2019 @01:39AM
(#21496753)
Why are people so committed to the idea that self-driving cars are anywhere near human standards? It just seems like a groundless assertion of faith to me.
Professional drivers can go for a million miles without an accident, and I don't believe anyone's autonomous driving software can get within an order of magnitude of that without a disengagement, even in favorable conditions.
You may disagree that a disengagement is equivalent to a human having an accident, but I strongly feel that it is. In either case, you have a situation where the driver reached a point where it was definitively unable to determine an appropriate next action.
Re:Andrej Karpathy talks about how Tesla's NNs are structure...
by tim333 on Sunday November 10, 2019 @06:34AM
(#21497570)
I don't think most people think they are near human standards now. But there is the prospect for them being there before too long.
Re:Andrej Karpathy talks about how Tesla's NNs are structure...
by JohnJamesRambo on Sunday November 10, 2019 @01:31AM
(#21496740)
https://www.greencarreports.com/news/1119936_tesla-fatal-cra...
“Perhaps that’s because, as it turns out, Teslas on Autopilot could have a higher fatal accident rate than those driven entirely by humans.”
Today thousands are dying every year on the road, are we just forbidding cars entirely?
> And no, failover control is not acceptable given the past incidents and deaths.
How many incidents/deaths per miles driven? How does it compare to all the other transportation systems?