News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:German solar and wind are triple the cost of French nucle... by hinkley on Saturday November 09, 2019 @06:22PM (#21495212)
Half life is almost as confusing as statistics. A halflife of 5 years means 10% of the radioactivity is still there 16 years later. You'll still get 1% of the rems 33 years later, and that's if the materials don't migrate.

Alpha decays are still problematic for any material that can by aspirated or ingested. Demolition means flying dust. A leaky building means groundwater contamination. A lot of these substances are also heavy metals, so even without the alpha decay problem they are highly toxic.

Can you keep a building full of alpha sources water tight for five or six half lives?

Re:German solar and wind are triple the cost of French nucle... by littlestymaar on Saturday November 09, 2019 @07:18PM (#21495498)
There would be no alpha sources left in the plant, as they are confined in the fuel rods, that would be taken away from the plant. (And be managed like spent fuel, which is a totally different problem than decommissioning).
Re:German solar and wind are triple the cost of French nucle... by lazyguy2 on Saturday November 09, 2019 @11:35PM (#21496420)
> A halflife of 5 years means 10% of the radioactivity is still there 16 years later.

But it's very likely that 10% is irrelevant.

Radioactivity is not a all or nothing thing. It exists all around you right now.

Camping out at a old abandoned nuclear power plant 20 years after it's decommissioned probably gives you less radiation exposure then you would get from a flight from California to Hong Kong.

Re:German solar and wind are triple the cost of French nucle... by acqq on Sunday November 10, 2019 @12:33AM (#21496575)
Iz’s not about camping. It’s about water. France is timy compared to the US.
Re:German solar and wind are triple the cost of French nucle... by petre on Sunday November 10, 2019 @01:53AM (#21496795)
Ever heard about RO water? You can get a RO water filter for 150€ if you're concerned about contamination.
Re:German solar and wind are triple the cost of French nucle... by hinkley on Sunday November 10, 2019 @10:45AM (#21498404)
That won’t solve water table contamination. Are you going to RO plants? The soil?
Re:German solar and wind are triple the cost of French nucle... by petre on Sunday November 10, 2019 @01:49AM (#21496781)
It's not confusing at all, or maybe only to people with irrational fears. Just leave the building sit for 50 years and you've got 1/2^10 Co60 left.

Also dispose the vitrified spent fuel in a repository after reprocessing it.