News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:We do not use foreign keys (2016) by matt4077 on Friday November 08, 2019 @05:22PM (#21487546)
> Foreign key violations are 100% data corruption

Sure, yes, of course, who cares?

These are self-imposed rules, so breaking them is wholly up to yourself. And there are trade-offs involved that may often make it acceptable relax them.

You seem to be rather invested in one set of arbitrary definitions. If people do fine even in situations where they "by definition" shouldn't, it's the definitions that have been found lacking, not the people.

Re:We do not use foreign keys (2016) by dragonwriter on Saturday November 09, 2019 @05:16AM (#21490658)
> Sure, yes, of course, who cares?

The stakeholder from whom you got the requirement on which the logical FK constraint is based, for one.

Re:We do not use foreign keys (2016) by hootbootscoot on Saturday November 09, 2019 @04:02PM (#21494332)
which may not exist.
Re:We do not use foreign keys (2016) by dragonwriter on Saturday November 09, 2019 @10:05PM (#21496146)
Why would you identify an FK relationship other than requirements?