News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Censorship is bad even when it’s done by private companies by P_I_Staker on Wednesday November 06, 2019 @01:43PM (#21465587)
Conservative viewpoints are political ideals. Scams are scams. If you don't make that distinction, then Ponzi schemes become protected speech.

There's also a clear (direct) profit motive, and it's depriving people of property. There's lots of ways this argument changes. When you censor political views, you're depriving people of their rights. Shutting out a swindler isn't even close to the same thing.

Re:Censorship is bad even when it’s done by private companies by F00bart on Wednesday November 06, 2019 @02:10PM (#21465916)
Are you really sure that is the distinction. A lot of conservative policies results in even the conservative voters being worse off as a result. And there IS a direct profit motive by those who fund conservative politicians (a.k.a. scammers)
Re:Censorship is bad even when it’s done by private companies by P_I_Staker on Wednesday November 06, 2019 @03:32PM (#21466887)
Absolutely, I'm 100% sure. I'm not talking about indirect "cui bono" desire to use politics to one's own advantage. Whether or not voters are worse off is subjective and debatable. Policy discussions are a form political participation. Selling a product isn't. There's a very clear distinction here. In my view, it's much less reasonable to make content distinctions based on "correct" political beliefs, vs. venders selling a product.