Both failures may have had something to do with "fuel", but they aren't in any way related.

The Crew Dragon abort test anomaly was caused by a problematic valve leaking oxidizer "backwards" into the helium tubes which are used to pressurize the system right before ignition. The second they pressurized, it sent a huge amount of oxidizer into the engine where there should have only been helium at the time which caused the explosion.

The AMOS-6 anomaly was caused by LOX pooling and working it's way into the liner of a COPV inside the LOX tank. The LOX got into the fibers, and a small amount of friction ignited the oxygen and caused the "boom".

They may seem similar in that they are both related to the oxidizers getting somewhere they shouldn't and igniting, but a rocket is pretty much just a tube of carefully controlled fuel and oxidizer and a nozzle to shoot it out.

Of course most problems are probably going to result in fuel or oxidizer getting somewhere it shouldn't, and when that happens they are going to explode. For laypeople the exact reason why the fuel and oxidizer mixed at the wrong time isn't really important, but don't fall into the trap of thinking that the 2 are related.

It's not being pedantic if you are correcting the conclusion.

You mentioned that fueling system issues have been a recurring theme in failures, and I just wanted to point out that it's not really correct. Even though the 2 failures looked somewhat similar from the outside, they actually had basically nothing in common.

I think I was also "correcting a conclusion"? A fuel system exploding and a rocket motor exploding are 2 failures that look somewhat similar from the outside, but in reality have nothing in common other than that they rely on one another. We are both arguing pedantics

I was just sharing information that I found interesting which kind of contradicted your claim that fueling was a common source of issues for SpaceX. I find this stuff super interesting, and I figured others might as well.

I'm not trying to argue or get in internet fights here, I just like talking about space stuff.

Same, and I thought it was important to point out that the Draco motor has so far been reliable in testing. The fuel systems seem to be tricky regardless of their failure modes: mechanical, or as you pointed out for Amos-6, material.

I too like talking about space stuff, I just think it's deconstructive to call out some random poster on the internet as pedantic lol